Men Cell suggests Counter Cases (9873540498) fightfalse498a.blogspot
Complaint 348422 Details
- Date Occurred: 04/14/2016
- Reported Damages: $0.00
- Location: India, New Delhi
- !
The complaint is against an online dating profile
The complaint is a listing fraud posted on public forums or sites against an anonymous entity
The complaint is mobile text spam or smishing related against an anonymous entity
The company or person contact no longer exists
International boundaries
Men Cell suggests Counter Cases (9873540498) fightfalse498a.blogspot.com
FALSE EVIDENCE AND OFFENCES AGAINST PUBLIC JUSTICE. 191. Giving false evidence
Whoever, being legally bound by an oath or by an express provision of law to state the
truth, or being bound by law to make a declaration upon any subject, makes any
statement which is false, and which he either knows or believes to be false or does not
believe to be true, is said to give false evidence.
If any help needed then please contact:-
man cell delhi is available 24 hours at our permanent email id aturchatur(at)yahoo(dot)com
moblie :- +91-9873540498
email:- aturchatur@yahoo.com
web:- http://fightfalse498a.blogspot.com
192. Fabricating false evidence
Whoever causes any circumstance to exist or makes any false entry in any book or
record, or makes any document containing a false statement, intending that such
circumstance, false entry or false statement may appear in evidence in a judicial
proceeding, or in a proceeding taken by law before a public servant as such, or before an
arbitrator, and that such circumstance, false entry or false statement, so appearing in
evidence, may cause any person who in such proceeding is to form an opinion upon the
evidence, to entertain an erroneous opinion touching any point material to the result of
such proceeding, is said “to fabricate false evidence”.
193. Punishment for false evidence
Whoever intentionally gives false evidence in any stage of a judicial proceeding, or
fabricates false evidence for the purpose of being used in any stage of a judicial
proceeding, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which
may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine, and whoever intentionally
gives or fabricates false evidence in any other case, shall be punished with imprisonment
of either description for a term which may extend to three years, and shall also be liable
to fine.
195. Giving or fabricating false evidence with intent to procure conviction of offence
punishable with imprisonment for life or imprisonment
Whoever gives or fabricates false evidence intending thereby to cause, or knowing it to
be likely that he will thereby cause, any person to be convicted of an offence which
102[by the law for the time being in force in 103[India]] is not capital, but punishable
with 104[imprisonment for life], or imprisonment for a term of seven years or upwards,
shall be punished as a person convicted of that offence would be liable to be punished.
196. Using evidence known to be false
Whoever corruptly uses or attempts to use as true or genuine evidence any evidence
which he knows to be false or fabricated, shall be punished in the same manner as if he
gave or fabricated false evidence.
199. False statement made in declaration which is by law receivable as
evidence
Whoever, in any declaration made or subscribed by him, which declaration any Court
of Justice, or any public servant or other person, is bound or authorized by law to receive
as evidence of any fact, makes any statement which is false, and which he either knows
or believes to be false or does not believe to be true, touching any point material to the
object for which the declaration is made or used, shall be punished in the same manner as
if he gave false evidence.
200. Using as true such declaration knowing it to be false
Whoever corruptly uses or attempts to use as true any such declaration, knowing the same to be false in any material point, shall be punished in the same manner as if he gave
false evidence.
209. Dishonestly making false claim in Court
Whoever fraudulently or dishonestly, or with intent to injure or annoy any person, makes
in a Court of Justice any claim which he knows to be false, shall be punished with
imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, and shall
also be liable to fine.
211. False charge of offence made with intent to injure
Whoever, with intent to cause injury to any person, institutes or causes to be instituted
any criminal proceeding against that person, or falsely charges any person with having
committed an offence, knowing that there is no just or lawful ground for such proceeding
or charge against that person, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description
for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both; and if such criminal
proceeding be instituted on a false charge of an offence punishable with death,
104[imprisonment for life], or imprisonment for seven years or upwards, shall be
punishable with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven
years, and shall also be liable to fine.
CHAPTER XXI: OF DEFAMATION
499. Defamation
Whoever, by words either spoken or intended to be read, or by signs or by visible
representations, makes or publishes any imputation concerning any person intending to
harm, or knowing or having reason to believe that such imputation will harm, the
reputation of such person, is said, except in the cases hereinafter expected, to defame that person.
First Exception- imputation of truth which public good, requires be making or
publishing – It is not defamation to impute anything which is true concerning any person,
if it be for the public good that the imputation should be made or published. Whether or
not it is for the public good is a question of fact.
Second Exception– Public conduct of public servants- It is not defamation to express in
a good faith any opinion whatever respecting the conduct of a public servant in the
discharge of his public functions, or respecting his character, so far as his character
appears in that conduct, and no further.
Third Exception– Conduct of any person touching any public question- It is not
defamation to express in good faith any opinion whatever respecting the conduct of any
person touching any public question, and respecting his character, so far as his character
appears in that conduct and no further.
Fourth Exception- Publication of reports of proceedings of Courts- It is not defamation
to publish substantially true report of the proceedings of a Court of Justice, or of the
result of any such proceedings.
Fifth Exception- Merits of case decided in Court or conduct of witnesses and others
concerned- It is not defamation to express in good faith any opinion whatever respecting
the merits of any case, civil or criminal, which has been decided by a Court of Justice, or
respecting the conduct of any person as a party, witness or agent, in any such case, or
respecting the character of such person, as far as his character appears in that conduct,
and no further.
Sixth Exception- Merits of public performance- It is not defamation to express in good
faith any opinion respecting the merits of any performance which its author has submitted
to the judgment of the public, or respecting the character of the author so far as his
character appears in such performance, and no further.
Seventh Exception- Censure passed in good faith by person having lawful authority
over another- It is not defamation in a person having over another any authority, either
conferred by law or arising out of a lawful contract made with that other, to pass in good
faith any censure on the conduct of that other in matters to which such lawful authority
relates.
Eight Exception – Accusation preferred in good faith to authorized person- It is not
defamation to prefer in good faith an accusation against any person to any of those who
have lawful authority over that person with respect to the subject-matter of accusation.
Ninth Exception- Imputation made in good faith by person for protection of his or
other’s interests- It is not defamation to make an imputation on the character of another
provided that the imputation be made in good faith for the protection of the interests of
the person making it, or of any other person, or for the public good.
500. Punishment for defamation
Whoever defames another shall be punished with simple imprisonment for a term which
may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.
If any help needed then please contact:-
man cell delhi is available 24 hours at our permanent email id aturchatur(at)yahoo(dot)com
moblie :- +91-9873540498
email:- aturchatur@yahoo.com
web:- http://fightfalse498a.blogspot.com
- MenCell SBID #e4151948ad
- Posted 04/14/2016
Comments
There are no comments posted. Be the first to comment on this complaint
Do You Have a Complaint?
Add a complaint and spread the word. High volume complaints have a better chance to get their money back. Submit a report and join forces with others like you!
Submit a Complaint NowBusiness Profile Summary
Company Statistics
- Complaint Against Men Cell suggests Counter Cases (9873540498) fightfalse498a.blogspot
- Complaints Filed: 1
- Reported Damages: $0.00
What is SBID?
SBID is a unique id code that identifies the user's computer and location. SBID is used to prevent fraudulent postings and help our community find users who create duplicate user accounts.